Pilot issue · August 4, 2026

Weekly research brief · Dyslexia

What matters.
What to do with it.

A concise, evidence-ranked scan for educational therapists—without the research-paper fog.

6 minute read2 research resources2 practice prompts
This week’s signal

The pilot establishes the evidence baseline. The first live research scan will replace these foundational resources after Sunday’s review.

What matters this week

Two ideas worth calibrating around

Vote on each one. Your feedback shapes the next scan.

01
High confidencePractice framework

Structured literacy is broader than phonics—and the distinction matters.

The International Dyslexia Association describes structured literacy as an approach to teaching the organization of spoken and written language—not as a synonym for a particular phonics program. Its content spans phoneme awareness; sound-symbol relationships; spelling patterns and conventions; syllable types; morphology, including roots and affixes; syntax; semantics; and meaningful work with connected text. Instruction is explicit, so concepts are directly explained and practiced with immediate guidance rather than left for students to infer. It is also systematic and cumulative, following a planned progression in which new learning builds on secure earlier skills. Just as important, it is diagnostic and responsive: the teacher watches response patterns, checks retention, and adjusts pacing, presentation, and practice. Hands-on or multimodal activities may support learning, but those activities are tools within the approach—not the defining feature or a substitute for careful instructional decisions.

Why it matters at edcahoots

Use the pilot brief to calibrate language across tutors: the useful question is not whether a session ‘used phonics,’ but how assessment data shaped the sequence, practice, and feedback.

Read the primary source International Dyslexia Association
02
High confidenceEvidence practice guide

Daily connected-text reading belongs alongside explicit foundational-skills work.

The What Works Clearinghouse’s kindergarten-through-grade-three practice guide makes four complementary recommendations rather than treating decoding and authentic reading as competing choices. It assigns strong evidence to developing awareness of speech-sound segments and their links to letters, and to teaching students to decode words, analyze word parts, and write and recognize words. It separately recommends that every student read connected text each day to support accuracy, fluency, and comprehension; the evidence rating for that recommendation is moderate. Daily text reading gives students a place to apply newly taught patterns, build automaticity, encounter language in context, and reveal whether a skill transfers beyond an isolated word list. The evidence ratings describe the strength and consistency of the supporting research, not the percentage of a lesson each practice should receive. The guide therefore supports pairing explicit foundational instruction with purposeful text practice adjusted to the learner’s current needs.

Why it matters at edcahoots

A session note can distinguish skill acquisition from transfer: what was taught explicitly, and where did the student apply it in connected text? That creates a clearer progress signal for the tutor and family.

Read the primary source Institute of Education Sciences · What Works Clearinghouse

Questions for the team

Turn evidence into a useful conversation.

01

Where does our session documentation show the clearest link between an observed error pattern and the next instructional move?

02

Hypothesis: one shared progress-monitoring checkpoint could improve tutor calibration without making sessions feel standardized.

Educational therapy research, filtered for practice.

Research information only—not individualized medical, diagnostic, or legal advice. Please do not include student names in feedback.

Weekly dyslexia research briefAugust 4, 2026

What matters this week

Two ideas worth calibrating around

A foundational calibration issue on the breadth of structured literacy and the role of daily connected-text reading.
1

High confidence · Practice framework

Structured literacy is broader than phonics—and the distinction matters.

Takeaway

Structured literacy combines explicit, systematic instruction with diagnostic responsiveness across language—not phonics alone.

Practice implication

Calibrate tutor notes around how observed errors shaped sequence, practice, and feedback.
2

High confidence · Evidence practice guide

Daily connected-text reading belongs alongside explicit foundational-skills work.

Takeaway

Explicit decoding and word-analysis instruction should be paired with daily connected-text reading.

Practice implication

Document both the skill taught and where the learner transferred it into connected text.

Questions for the team

• Where does our session documentation show the clearest link between an observed error pattern and the next instructional move?

• Hypothesis: one shared progress-monitoring checkpoint could improve tutor calibration without making sessions feel standardized.

Primary sources

1. International Dyslexia Association: https://dyslexiaida.org/structured-literacy-effective-instruction-for-students-with-dyslexia-and-related-reading-difficulties/

2. Institute of Education Sciences · What Works Clearinghouse: https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/PracticeGuide/21/Published

Built by Brantley